- Who should be the winner of The Walters Prize 2010 and why? Summarise in one sentence.
I was immediately drawn to Hobbs' work by the colour schemes, compositions, humour and unusual moments portrayed. My immediate reaction to this work was respect and appreciation for the precise moments of time she captures. This is a theme she considers with relation to humour in her work - when is the punchline? Is it knowing something is about to happen, the moment it happens, or the moment immediately after? This exhibition demonstrates the subjects mid action, rolling, falling, spewing.. & causes you to wonder, what happens before & after? She is also interested in the relationship between the subjects and the viewer, highlighting this by capturing almost awkward and comical self portraits and including the cord for the remote shutter. Peter Shand has commented "the absurd is a condition that's present neither in us alone nor in the world as it stands but in the misregistration that results from the fact of that presence together." Hobbs considers this theory in the cafefully captured, precise moments she portrays and demonstrates within this exhibition.
The work which spoke to me most about the concept of the absurd is the video installation Tumbleweeds, 2004. Hobbs has taken the stereotype of tumbleweeds rolling across a Western movie style landscape and replaced the tumbleweeds with people. This is direct reference to her time spent at the California Institute of the Arts, where two of her assignments were to watch a Western movie each day (she hated Westerns), and to study the landscape which surrounded her. Tumbleweeds have obvious stereotypical connotations of boredom and lack happenings and she pokes fun at the absurdity of the situation she is in, also mocking Western films. As I watched the film and waited for the next 'tumbleweeds' to appear, the absurdity struck me of the viewer staring at nothing happening, and it seemed as though I was the willing subject and participant of a private but open joke.
Tumbleweeds, 2004, 3 min single channel video
Tumbleweeds reminded me of a work by Tino Sehgal which a friend of mine performed in during the Auckland Triennial this year. This work involved employing dancers to constantly roll for hours in a row in a very specific pattern & time frame, taking over from each other to cover the entire chronological length of the exhibition. Upon further research, it seems he is interested in making art which rejects materiality, and his works involve performance art which only lasts the length of the exhibition, studying the relationship between the viewer and the exhibit within the art gallery. This theme runs parallel with Hobbs' interest in the interaction between the viewer and the work. Whereas in Hobbs' work, the absurdity & punchline are obvious to the viewer & shared with the artist, Sehgal seems to be an experiment of a private agenda & leave the viewer & performer to interprete at will. I remember one of the dancers confiding in me that she had no idea what his work was about, and sometimes she would experiment with rolling slightly differently to the precisely prescribed pattern, to test if he was watching somewhere, & see what would happen. Sehgal did not even visit Auckland during that time (he is based in Europe & anti air flight) and the dancers merely followed a set of very specific instructions. The absurdity here is evident - did the artist even have any idea how his installation was progressing? It seems to me that the absurdity of this is a poignant element of his work and that perhaps the performers were part of the experiment as much as the viewer. Other works of his include a couple kissing. He creates awkward moments of confusion and questions the way the viewer looks at the artwork, forcing them to realise their participation. Hobbs also highlights his moment, but rather more empathetically, and via a photographic medium. Sehgal's works exist only as constructed situations between the performer and the viewer. Hobbs invites the viewer to enjoy the absurdity of the joke in an up front fashion, whereas Sehgal leaves the viewer wondering.This doesn't tie in with any comment I would like to make about the absurd, but Jump, 2009, distinctly reminded me of Henri Cartier-Bresson's famous photograph Behind the Gare St Lazare, and seems to pay homage to this work. That the subject is fully clothed lends itself to the theme of absurdity, as this act captured by Hobbs serves no evident purpose. Peter Shand comments in his essay that "Bas Jan Ader riding his bicycle into an Amsterdam canal, for example, is the sort of bathetic slapstick that both amuses and draws attention to a shared existential condition. The activity is essentially meaningless or at least it serves no singly declared purpose." This could be applied also to Jump. Why is the subject jumping fully clothed into the water? Why is he alone on a raft in the middle of the water? The viewer is left wondering.
L-r: Behind the Gare St Lazare, Henri Cartier-Bresson, 1932. Jump, Rebecca Ann Hobbs, 2009
Hobbs' works also reminded me somewhat of works by photographer Diane Arbus. Each photographer approaches their general subject matter from a different angle. However, both capture that moment which leaves the viewer to wonder, and play on society's conventions. Arbus, in this image below, captures an otherwise happy child in an exasperated moment, clutching a toy hand grenade. Here is an example of a darkly humous, absurd image. Arbus famously photographed freaks and the viewer is invited to consider the story behind this image, whilst at the same time enjoy the face value of the comedy it provides. The image I have included from the series Suck Roar by Hobbs also captures an absurd moment, poking fun at the concept of beastiality and playing with implications, confronting the viewer.
& finally... Dan Arps should be the winner of The Walter Prize 2010 because all the other finalists are awful.
Source material for this blog entry:
- http://www.realtimearts.net/article/52/69086908
- Discussions with performance artists
- http://www.aut.ac.nz/study-at-aut/study-areas/art-design/learning-environment/st-paul-street-gallery/exhibition-2010/previous-exhibitions2/march---april/The-4th-Auckland-Triennials/art-design/learning-environment/st-paul-street-gallery/exhibition-2010/previous-exhibitions2/march---april/The-4th-Auckland-Triennial
- http://re-pubblica.blog.kataweb.it/2008/03/04/constructed-situations-tino-sehgal-magasin-3-stockholm-konsthall/
I'm Walking Backwards for Christmas, essay by Peter Shand
Revelations, Diane Arbus, 2003
Articulate, June/July/August 2010, St Paul St Galleries, AUT University
http://www.realtimearts.net/data/images/art/23/2303_hobbs.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_with_Toy_Hand_Grenade_in_Central_Park
2003-2006 Diane Arbus: Revelations. Victoria and Albert Museum, London